Keywords:-
Article Content:-
Abstract
This study explores students' mathematical abilities by reviewing the type of students' adversity quotient. This research was conducted using a literature study research method with data sources derived from journals or relevant research with the requirements set as data sources, namely Sinta or Scopus-indexed journals from 2019 - 2024. The research results showed that students with the climber type have better mathematical ability than students with the quitter and camper types. This happens because of the different efforts made by students of each type in solving and overcoming each problem presented. Students with the quitter type at the math ability level are only able to understand and determine strategies that can be used to overcome difficulties. However, it cannot be done in its application. Students with the camper type at the mathematics ability level are able to enter the completion stage. However, students with this type often experience errors in the stages of completion. Finally, students with the climber type fulfilled all indicators of the mathematical abilities explored. However, sometimes, some students with this type experience failure in coming up with new alternative ideas that correspond to the re-examination indicator.
References:-
References
Abdiyani, S. S., et al. 2019. Profile of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students Based on Polya's Steps Given Adversity Quotient. Al-Khwarizmi: Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education, 7(2): 123 – 134
Adam, A. H. E., et al. 2022. Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Ability of SMP Negeri 1 Juwana Students in Solving Mathematics Problems because of Adversity Quotient. AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 13(2): 213 – 225
Adlini, M. N. et al. (2022). Qualitative Research Methods of Literature Study. EDUMASPUL Journal of Education, 6(1): 974 – 980
Aini, N. N., & Mukhlis, M. (2020). Analysis of Problem-Solving Ability on Mathematics Story Problems Based on Polya's Theory in View of Adversity Quotient. Alifmatika: Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning, 2(1): 105 – 128
Almubarokah, N., et al. 2024. Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving in View of Adversity Quotient (AQ) on Social Arithmetic Material. Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1): 163 – 174
Annikmah, I., et al. 2020. The Effect of Self-Confidence and Adversity Quotient on Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. PYTHAGORAS: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 9(2): 106 – 113
Anwar, L., et al. (2024). Adversity quotient of Indonesian prospective mathematics teachers in solving geometry higher-order thinking skills problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1): 79 – 98
Astiantari, I., et al. 2022. Critical Thinking Ability of Junior High School Students in Solving Mathematics Problems in View of Adversity Quotient. AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 11(2): 1270 - 1281
Awalia, N & Saputri, S. 2023. Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in Problem-Based Learning Model in View of Adversity Quotient. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 4(3): 1599 – 1607
Azizah, S. (2020). The Effect of Learning Model and Adversity Quotient on Mathematics Connection Ability. Indonesian Journal of Education, 1(3): 370 – 396
Baharullah, et al. 2022. Profile of Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in View of Adversity Quotient. AKSIOMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 11(2): 1039 – 1051
Bellyana, A., and Musrikah. 2024. Students' Ability in Pisa Standardized Mathematics Problem Solving (Program For International Student Assessment) in View of Adversity Quotient in Class VIII MTsN 5 Tulungagung. Journal on Education, 6(3): 16540 – 16548
Hidayanti, L. N., et al. 2023. The Direct Effect of Adversity Quotient, Mathematical Disposition, and Mathematical Connection Ability on Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability. Dharmas Education Journal, 4(2): 811 – 824
Kartika, R. W., Megawanti, P., & Hakim, A. R. (2021). The effect of adversity quotient and task commitment on mathematics problem-solving ability. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(2): 206 - 216
Lestari, I. D., and Juandi, D. 2023. Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Reviewed From Adversity Quotient: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 13(1): 56 – 75
Lestari, W., et al. 2022. Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Through Adversity Quotient and Task Commitment. SEPREN: Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 4(1): 56 – 62
Manazila, S. I., et al. 2022. Creative Thinking Ability Based on Adversity Quotient Type in Mathematics Learning. Cendekia Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2): 1788 – 1796
Mefiana, S. A., et al. (2023). Students' Mathematical Understanding in View of Productive Striving Power. Cendekia Journal: Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(3): 2368 – 2381
Merianah. (2019). The Effect of Emotional Intelligence and Adversity Quotient on Mathematics Problem-Solving Ability of Students of SDIT IQRA'1 Bengkulu City. Rafflesia Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1): 29 – 35
Nilasari, N. T., and Anggreini, D. 2019. Students' Mathematical Literacy Ability in Solving PISA Problems in View of Adversity Quotient. Journal of Elements, 5(2): 206 – 219
Nurfitriyanti, M., Rosa, N. M., & Nursa'adah, F. P. 2020. Adversity Quotient and Locus of Control and Their Effect on Mathematics Problem Solving Ability. Proceedings of the National Seminar of Science 2020, 1(1): 479 – 486
Nurhikmah, et al. 2023. Profile of Students' Mathematical Spatial Reasoning Ability in Cube and Block Material in terms of Adversity Quotient in Class IX at SMP Negeri 1 Galesong Utara. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2): 215 – 228
Purwanto, E. (2024). Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability in Problem-Solving Viewed From Adversity Quotient. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research, 5(1): 7 – 14
Purwosetiyono, F. X. D., et al. 2022. Reasoning Ability of Junior High School Students in Solving Mathematics Literacy Problems in Adversity Quotient Type Students. Enggang: Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts and Culture, 3(1): 1 – 10
Rahmayantri, A., and Priatna, N. 2022. Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Grade VII Students in Solving Social Arithmetic Problems Based on Adversity Quotient Type. EduMatSains, 7(1): 197 – 208
Ramini and Setyadi, D. 2021. Profile of Mathematics Problem Solving in View of Adversity Quotient. Journal of Mathematics Learning Research, 14(1): 52 – 61
Rizalno, S. M., and Purwanto, S. E. 2022. Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability: The Impact Of Adversity Quotient On Triangle And Quadrilateral Shapes Material. Decimal: Journal of Mathematics, 5(2): 143 – 154
Rusmania, S. A., et al. 2023. Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability in View of Adversity Quotient on Number Pattern Material for Class VIII Students of SMPN 3 Pringgarata in the 2023/2024 Academic Year. Pendas: Scientific Journal of Basic Education, 8 (3): 5267 – 5281
Sari, M. and Asmendri. 2020. Library Research in Science Education Research. NATURAL SCIENCE: Journal of Education in the Field of Science and Science Education, 6 (1): 41 – 53
Siswanto, Eko, Aziz, Tian Abdul, El Hakim, Lukman. 2024. Improving Critical Thinking Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving: Philosophy and Adversity Quotient Perspective. JP2M (Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning), 10(1): 17 – 27
Supono, L., et al. 2024. Mathematical Connections of Students Viewed From Adversity Quotient in Problem-Based Learning Using Math City Map. AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(1): 74 – 84
Triana, E., & Afri, L. D. (2023). Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts and Adversity Quotient Students Reviewed from Al-Qur'an Memorize Ability. Mathematics Innovation (Inomatika), 5(2): 113 – 130
Yuniara, R., et al. 2023. Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Based On The Steps Of Ideal Problem Solving Viewed From Adversity Quotient (AQ). Al Khawarizmi: Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning, 7(1): 36 - 47